Opened 10 years ago

Closed 7 years ago

#1723 closed defect (wontfix)

Tinderbox seems to have fallen behind the times

Reported by: BigBaaadBob Owned by: cjb
Priority: high Milestone: 8.2.0 (was Update.2)
Component: tinderbox Version:
Keywords: tinderbox Cc: cjl
Blocked By: Blocking:
Deployments affected: Action Needed: never set
Verified: no


As I discus in the talk page about os images in the general wiki ( tinderbox hasn't kept up with recent images. Copying that text here:

Tinderbox ( only lists information up through build 389, even though the header says it knows the latest build is 443 and stable is 406. The most recent build at seems to be 451. But if I click the "automated test results" from that build (or 443 or 406 or any of the recent ones for that matter), which is, I get a "not found" message.

All of this leads me to wonder if the tinderbox setup at RH has rotted from neglect.

Change History (8)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by jg

  • Component changed from distro to tinderbox
  • Milestone changed from Untriaged to Trial-2
  • Owner changed from jg to cjb

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by cjb

I'm aiming to get the tinderbox back up (with an LX CPU, power measurement, activity testing, ..) running builds again next week, after the B4 push dies down. I'll have it go over the missed builds first.

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by jg

  • Milestone changed from Trial-2 to Trial-3

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by jg

  • Priority changed from normal to high

comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by kimquirk

  • Milestone changed from Untriaged to First Deployment, V1.0

comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by cjl

  • Action Needed set to never set
  • Cc cjl added

cjb, does tinderbox even exist anymore?

comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by cjl

Is there any point in keeping tinderbox bugs open?

comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by Quozl

  • Resolution set to wontfix
  • Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.